Executive Education for Managers and Supervisors: Better Together?

‍

Why a Family of Simulations Beats One-Size-Fits-All Training

Maybe a one-size-fits-all simulation will meet your training needs.

But if you need multiple simulations for different audiences, make sure:

• They share a common ‘look and feel.’
• They use consistent language, dynamics, and visuals.

If your manager training uses different models or terminology than your frontline training, you risk:

• Confusing participants.
• Complicating communication between teams.
• Undermining long-term learning outcomes.

Find a Family of Simulations

The best approach is to find a family of simulations that:

• Share a common foundation but adapt to different audiences.
• Use consistent financial language—so that supervisors and managers can discuss insights easily.
• Reflect real-world decision-making for each group’s responsibilities.

At Income/Outcome, we designed our simulations with this in mind.

Our workshops range from:

• Short sessions for frontline employees.
• 1-day or 2-day programs for mid-level managers.
• Strategically complex simulations for senior executives.

The core elements—like the game board and visual financial language—remain the same across all versions.
The complexity and decision-making focus adjust to the audience’s needs.

Different Audiences, Different Decisions

In the real world:

• Hourly employees impact efficiency, quality, and costing—and need practical simulations to mirror those dynamics.
• Senior executives make big-picture decisions about expansion, new products, and markets—and need a simulation that models strategic-level thinking.

The challenge is to teach financial and business fundamentals across these very different roles without creating silos.

That’s why a shared simulation framework works so well.
Participants at all levels can connect their learning to the broader business landscape.

Build Business Acumen Across Your Organization

When designing simulations, ensure they:

1. Use the same financial framework.
2. Reinforce consistent concepts—like cash flow, profit, and working capital.
3. Adjust the complexity to match the participant's role and responsibilities.

With Income/Outcome, everyone—from the factory floor to the boardroom—shares a common financial language.
The fundamentals remain familiar across simulations, even as decisions become more complex.

Key Questions to Ask a Training Provider

Before investing in multiple simulations:

• Will participants at different levels of the organization share a common financial language?
• Can people from sales, operations, and finance use the same terms and mental models to discuss decisions?
• Do the simulations get more complex as people progress in their careers—without changing the fundamental framework?

The Bottom Line

Business simulations should bridge gaps, not create new ones.
A family of simulations with a consistent core structure:

• Strengthens cross-functional understanding.
• Helps teams collaborate more effectively.
• Ensures learning applies from frontline decisions to executive strategy.

And that’s when simulations truly pay off.

‍